User panel stuff on forum
Index  ‹  General Discussion  ‹  4on4
  6 posts on 1 page  1
General Discussion
2008-11-18, 19:23
Member
357 posts

Registered:
Nov 2008
Why 4on4 is (almost) allways played in dmm1 ??
I think its very slow, specially in dm3 with only 1 rl and 1 lg, both two in same place.
Duels, 2on2 and ffa are very very fast and imo funnier, in 4on4 you still waiting for your weapon :/
Why not play 4on4 in dmm3?
"the quieter you become, the more you are able to hear"
2008-11-18, 20:05
Member
518 posts

Registered:
Jan 2006
dmm3 modus in 4on4? That will remove all teamplay and make it a FFA game.

4on4 is all about timing items, teamplay, playing smart, using your weapons right, and don't die or give away your weapon.

This is what makes qw so hardcore to any other game.
2008-11-18, 20:56
Administrator
2059 posts

Registered:
Jan 2006
Download some demos from the early days of the Challenge-Smackdown 4on4 tournament when DM6 was included in the map pool (yes, as a 4on4 map) and played in DMM3. It was pure chaos and it sucked ass.

Once you get the hang of the 4on4 gameplay i think you will appreciate it much much more.
www.facebook.com/QuakeWorld
2008-11-18, 22:13
Member
1754 posts

Registered:
Jan 2006
EGDA(old clan) and suddendeath played dm6 dmm3 once in the 4v4-ladder we got creamed but we won e4m6(home map) :>
2008-11-18, 22:35
Member
357 posts

Registered:
Nov 2008
GG! ^_^
I think i love chaos and ffa, but i can understand..., maybe dmm3 its very random for competitive games ??
"the quieter you become, the more you are able to hear"
2008-11-18, 23:30
News Writer
169 posts

Registered:
Dec 2007
It has to do with control. If items despawn once you pick them up there will only be so few of them at the same time and thus it will all be about controlling them.
DMM3 works very well in duel as you still have control when it comes to armor and to some extent ammo, however in 4on4 just controlling armor and ammo isn't enough.
  6 posts on 1 page  1