QuakeWorld.nu Forum

QuakeWorld.nu Forum

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Hi! Please read the rules. Please pay close attention to rules 1 & 5 in particular!

Poll

Do you want to see jawnmode introduced as a standard setting here?

Yes

45% - 24
No

54% - 29
Total: 53

#1 18 Jun 2007 22:12:15

molgrum
Admin
Registered: 22 May 2006
Posts: 726

FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

What is jawnmode?
JawnMode is a few tweaks to QW to promote additional skills and remove
randomness that negates existing skills. You can toggle it in mods that
support it (KTX supports it from me) with the command "jawnmode" in the
console, if you want to try it.
Read more here.

After reading the link above, these changes has been made by me:
* Your xy-speed is preserved through teleporters and is capped according to a cvar k_teleport_cap (use /teleportcap <percent to subtract from original speed>), a good value is 24.
* Lowered SNG damage to 16, was 18.
* Increased SSG damage (84 is max, was 64), increased SSG reload time (0.8 s, was 0.7 s).
* Reverted armor absorption rates for YA and RA, only GA is now changed (0.4 instead of 0.3).
* When you're gibbed, you'll not be able to respawn instantly (the same 900 ms wait time applies there).
* Fairpacks (drop last weapon fired) enabled. [disputed and disabled in the latest version]
* New "fair spawns" spawnmode, read at http://www.quakeworld.nu/forum/viewpoll … 616#p23616.

Why jawnmode?
To promote a more fair environment without random being a factor in the
gameplay. The mode can be altered later on for improvements, for example
I'm thinking about adding this as a hardcoded setting too. Also stuff like this
could use a tryout.

It could be tried out one season or so, post your thoughts about it.
Remember, it's about having fun.


---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.

Offline

 

#2 19 Jun 2007 02:01:59

Peppe
Member
From: Väsby, Stockholm
Registered: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 1761

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

yes

Offline

 

#3 19 Jun 2007 11:21:19

Apollyon
Admin
From: Berlin
Registered: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 59

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

No.

When trying to introduce something unpopular to QW, new maps in this case, it makes no sense to introduce something even more unpopular (changing physics/gameplay mechanics). That's like so kenya^2 !

Offline

 

#4 19 Jun 2007 12:40:37

NeFuRii
Member
Registered: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 128

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

that's why its good for kenya, its for people who want to try new things.
What exactly makes no sense? It makes perfect sense to try introducing new things to the part of community that already enjoys the new maps, I would even enjoy playing a different mod each weak, making this kenya^4.

Last edited by NeFuRii (19 Jun 2007 12:50:38)

Offline

 

#5 19 Jun 2007 17:12:48

molgrum
Admin
Registered: 22 May 2006
Posts: 726

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

My thoughts exactly! Try introducing these things in a TB3 tourney, chances are skyhigh that the people playing in those tourneys are conservative players in general that don't like to try new things.


---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.

Offline

 

#6 20 Jun 2007 23:57:07

JohnNy_cz
ezQuake developer
From: Czech Republic
Registered: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 1055
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

In my opinion it is quite right time to see a tournament in this mode. I'd also like pm_airstep be enabled very much.

Last edited by JohnNy_cz (20 Jun 2007 23:59:00)

Offline

 

#7 21 Jun 2007 01:54:51

Apollyon
Admin
From: Berlin
Registered: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 59

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

NeFuRii wrote:

What exactly makes no sense?

The QW scene is very conservative and not really open to change. Thus it makes no sense to introduce two new things at once. I personally love the the idea of the kenya tourneys but trying new gameplay mechanics as well is too much for me, especially because i think that some randomness is good. "Luck is a skill", you know?

Offline

 

#8 21 Jun 2007 02:04:31

Ake Vader
Administrator
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
Registered: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 1310
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

NeFurii wrote:

1) increase power of shotgun/double shotgun
2) increase speeed and power of nails
3) substitute nailgun with railgun

JohnNy_cz wrote:

In my opinion it is quite right time to see a tournament in this mode. I'd also like pm_airstep be enabled very much.

There is already a game and community with all these features - it's called Challenge Promode Arena. smile

Offline

 

#9 21 Jun 2007 09:51:19

JohnNy_cz
ezQuake developer
From: Czech Republic
Registered: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 1055
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Oh, an irony!
Hehe, in the end, you all have your scepticism, but if such tourney starts, some players join it and they will have fun and maybe they give some feedback to improving the mod. And that is the point.

Offline

 

#10 21 Jun 2007 10:15:09

Willgurht
Admin
From: Stockholm
Registered: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 554

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

i like some parts of jawnmode.

However i dont like the faster nails for duels, as it wouldnt be as good bunny-blocker on lets say dm6,dm4

On maps with large open areas (cmt4,cmt3 comes to mind) faster nails could make these weapons more usefull.

Offline

 

#11 21 Jun 2007 18:16:13

molgrum
Admin
Registered: 22 May 2006
Posts: 726

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

When it comes to faster nails, I'm thinking of large maps like DM3, just to take a TB3 example. On kenya maps (that tend to be much larger) it's more useful though, especially on bunny-maps with alot of ramps and long corridors.
The non-random stuff is just an obviously neccessary tweak, you can't argue about this with any other argument than "it's been there all the time", and then you are a hypocrite if you're playing with r_fullbrightSkins and any other client than QWCL etc.

Better GA would make stuff more interesting as well, as you can actually gain something from taking the time to snatch it before attacking, I know that on 2on2 DM6 you don't usually wait for the GA because it gives too little for the 20 second wait.

How about fairpacks? Again this is a more interesting mode to play with since it completely eliminates weapon scripts and activates another skill: Shoot SG before dying or you'll end up dropping RL.

Removal of death animations that differ in time (anything other than the more common 900 ms) have been stripped out, also something completely obvious to me since you'll be able to get a skill of spawning exactly when the animation is over if the animation is the same time length, always.


---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.

Offline

 

#12 21 Jun 2007 20:00:52

Peppe
Member
From: Väsby, Stockholm
Registered: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 1761

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Ake Vader wrote:

NeFurii wrote:

1) increase power of shotgun/double shotgun
2) increase speeed and power of nails
3) substitute nailgun with railgun

JohnNy_cz wrote:

In my opinion it is quite right time to see a tournament in this mode. I'd also like pm_airstep be enabled very much.

There is already a game and community with all these features - it's called Challenge Promode Arena. smile

..and they have much more than qw to offer, ctf for example

Offline

 

#13 21 Jun 2007 23:05:55

Ake Vader
Administrator
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
Registered: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 1310
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Peppe wrote:

Ake Vader wrote:

NeFurii wrote:

1) increase power of shotgun/double shotgun
2) increase speeed and power of nails
3) substitute nailgun with railgun

JohnNy_cz wrote:

In my opinion it is quite right time to see a tournament in this mode. I'd also like pm_airstep be enabled very much.

There is already a game and community with all these features - it's called Challenge Promode Arena. smile

..and they have much more than qw to offer, ctf for example

And a DM mode that changes every second month. Enough offtopic though. :p

Offline

 

#14 21 Jun 2007 23:07:58

Ake Vader
Administrator
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
Registered: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 1310
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

molgrum wrote:

Better GA would make stuff more interesting as well, as you can actually gain something from taking the time to snatch it before attacking, I know that on 2on2 DM6 you don't usually wait for the GA because it gives too little for the 20 second wait.

GA is still important now though as if you grab it, you can survive one full direct rocket hit compared to if you didn't have it. It's the small things that adds up to a bigger picture.

Offline

 

#15 24 Jun 2007 07:22:06

molgrum
Admin
Registered: 22 May 2006
Posts: 726

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Made some more modifications to jawnmode in latest KTX:

* Your xy-speed is preserved through teleporters and is capped according to a cvar k_teleport_cap (use /teleportcap <percent to subtract from original speed>)
* Fallbunny has the same cap-feature (k_fallbunny_cap and /fallbunnycap), for compromising the discussion about it on or off and perhaps adding some more skill to it.

I tried /teleportcap 25 and /fallbunnycap 5, seems like pretty good values.

I'm probably going to add a "weighted spawn-system" too that basically makes sure you spawn evenly on all spawns, a feature I personally think would make a positive difference. I can go into more specifics on how it works after it's done.

What are your thoughts on this?

Last edited by molgrum (24 Jun 2007 07:25:14)


---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.

Offline

 

#16 24 Jun 2007 09:12:07

NeFuRii
Member
Registered: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 128

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

good, good, but I want projectiles teleporting like the thing you showed us on your server.
it's quite a game play difference, but a fucking load of fun smile

Offline

 

#17 24 Jun 2007 12:22:22

empezar
nQuake developer
Registered: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 1902
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

heh

when a feature negates skill, it's a bad feature cause it negates skill
when a feature promotes skill, it's a bad feature cause it's new

Offline

 

#18 24 Jun 2007 14:22:45

JohnNy_cz
ezQuake developer
From: Czech Republic
Registered: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 1055
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

molgrum wrote:

Your xy-speed is preserved through teleporters

In this point your mod tries to go into too many directions. You already have 1) remove randomness 2) increase power of existing items like *nailgun, green armor and now you are adding completely new skill. That's ok, but now I don't know what are you plans with your mod, you think that it will become new standard or that will co-exist with existing mods? In my opinion if you add this, it will never become a new standard, because it adds completely new skill and if you put a switch/limit on it, noone will use the switch/limit.
About fallbunny - take a deep breath and force only one solution on it imho, otherwise the discussions about one of the most unimportant gameplay features will never end.

molgrum wrote:

I'm probably going to add a "weighted spawn-system" too that basically makes sure you spawn evenly on all spawns

That sentence doesn't say absolutely anything.
In every good spawn system it has to be easy to understand
- how does the algorithm work in detail,
- what are the probabilities for any scenario in the game and
- how it affects the gameplay

In the current spawn system:
- the algorithm is easy to understand, howeever noone knows how all those spawn modes work
- the probabilities are easy to calculate because the random function is very well known (I'm talking about the maths side of it, that's important)
- it is known how it affects the gameplay because it's used for many years

In the current system you also do spawn evenly on all spawns! - yes you do, because that's how probability works.

What I'm trying to say - when I've made my own "smart spawn point probabilities" system, the algorithm was simple and the probabilities of some scenarios were simple too. But I'm not able to answer for example "What is the probability, that a player will spawn on point A twich as much then on point B."
You can answer that for current spawn system, it's some not hard maths, but if you start designing your algorithm wrongly, you will not be able to answer such questions.

Offline

 

#19 24 Jun 2007 15:09:59

sassa
Administrator
From: Umeå, Sweden
Registered: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 2213
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

I only like the fairpacks

Offline

 

#20 24 Jun 2007 16:04:19

molgrum
Admin
Registered: 22 May 2006
Posts: 726

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

JohnNy_cz wrote:

In this point your mod tries to go into too many directions. You already have 1) remove randomness 2) increase power of existing items like *nailgun, green armor and now you are adding completely new skill. That's ok, but now I don't know what are you plans with your mod, you think that it will become new standard or that will co-exist with existing mods? In my opinion if you add this, it will never become a new standard, because it adds completely new skill and if you put a switch/limit on it, noone will use the switch/limit.
About fallbunny - take a deep breath and force only one solution on it imho, otherwise the discussions about one of the most unimportant gameplay features will never end.

The plans for now is to try it in FTK a bit and see how the response is, and either:
1) Place it into rules, or
2) Make a different league

I'm thinking that FFA in particular would be fine with this mode, because of the nature of FFA. 1on1 etc however is harder and requires more thought and planning for it to work out, but I'm hoping that it will make its way into KTK eventually. For now I'm adding these things as experiments to see how it works out and advertise it so people know that the mode exists.

JohnNy_cz wrote:

That sentence doesn't say absolutely anything.
In every good spawn system it has to be easy to understand
- how does the algorithm work in detail,
- what are the probabilities for any scenario in the game and
- how it affects the gameplay

In the current spawn system:
- the algorithm is easy to understand, howeever noone knows how all those spawn modes work
- the probabilities are easy to calculate because the random function is very well known (I'm talking about the maths side of it, that's important)
- it is known how it affects the gameplay because it's used for many years

In the current system you also do spawn evenly on all spawns! - yes you do, because that's how probability works.

What I'm trying to say - when I've made my own "smart spawn point probabilities" system, the algorithm was simple and the probabilities of some scenarios were simple too. But I'm not able to answer for example "What is the probability, that a player will spawn on point A twich as much then on point B."
You can answer that for current spawn system, it's some not hard maths, but if you start designing your algorithm wrongly, you will not be able to answer such questions.

The reasons why I didn't explain it further was:
* It's not implemented yet
* I didn't think anyone would care about details
* I was tired

But here goes:

Each player gets their own set of spawn point weights, for example for 6 spawn points of the map, you (individually) get a list of them all set to 1:
1 1 1 1 1 1

Now when you're going to spawn, it checks all points for newly spawned players (every new spawnmodel does this btw) and sets NUMSPOTS to how many free spots are available.
Let's say all spots are free for our first spawn, it now creates a random number RND = [0..NUMSPOTS-1] = [0..6-1] = [0..5]
Let's say it picks 3.14.
Now the algorithm picks a spot based on this simplified algorithm:

Try SPOT #1: Subtract SPOT #1's weight from RND, is RND <= 0?
If so, pick this spot, or else repeat for SPOT #2, SPOT #3, etc etc...

SPOT = SPOT #1;
while (RND >= 0)
{
    RND = RND - SPOT_WEIGHT;
   
    BESTSPOT = SPOT;
    SPOT = SPOT->NEXT;
}

We can see that in the example it will do this:
Subtract SPOT #1's weight (1) and get 2.14 (not <= 0 so don't pick SPOT #1)
Subtract SPOT #2's weight (1) and get 1.14 (not <= 0 so don't pick SPOT #2)
Subtract SPOT #3's weight (1) and get 0.14 (not <= 0 so don't pick SPOT #3)
Subtract SPOT #4's weight (1) and get -0.86 (this is <= 0 so pick SPOT #4).
SPOT #4 is picked!

Now it takes the weight of spot #4, divides it by 2 (this was your idea Johnny smile), and distributes the rest amongst the other spots, like so:
1.1 1.1 1.1 0.5 1.1 1.1

So the sum is always the number of spawn points on the map, that's the point of weights.

And now the process is done, we spawn! Now when the next time you spawn comes, you'll have less probability to spawn at SPOT #4 and more probability to spawn on the other spots (equal probability in this example).
After a while it could look like this:
0.1 0.6 0.8 1.9 2.4 0.2

Which again, means that you have a low spawn-count on SPOT #5, and therefore have a higher probability to spawn there in the future.

So Johnny, you say that I can't tell the probability of spawning here? I beg to differ:
0.1 / 6 ~= 1.7%
0.6 / 6 = 10.0%
0.8 / 6 ~= 13.3%
1.9 / 6 ~= 31.7%
2.4 / 6 = 40.0%
0.2 / 6 ~= 3.3%

Which brings -> 1.7% 10.0% 13.3% 31.7% 40.0% 3.3%

Remark: The numbers are actually floats, so they're not limited to just one decimal, I just use it for simplification.

This was written kinda hasty, hope it's not too messy to grasp...

Last edited by molgrum (24 Jun 2007 17:57:55)


---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.

Offline

 

#21 24 Jun 2007 17:57:37

JohnNy_cz
ezQuake developer
From: Czech Republic
Registered: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 1055
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

As I've said, the algorithm description is only one third of what makes good spawn system. What this algorithm only does in my opinion, is that it decreases the variance. But can you proove it?

Offline

 

#22 24 Jun 2007 19:46:50

goqsane
Member
From: België
Registered: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 670
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

No.


http://slip.4.pl/ - unblocking myspace facebook firewall

Offline

 

#23 25 Jun 2007 18:28:52

Kalma
Member
Registered: 02 Feb 2006
Posts: 323

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

I don't understand why randomness should be reduced, anyway. It just adds variance to the game. While it might give a slight underdog better chances to win, it does not _negate_ skill. It is not unfair (as long as random number generator isn't biased smile ). And reacting to random events is a skill too.

Offline

 

#24 30 Jun 2007 12:08:28

mli
Admin
From: Finland
Registered: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 156
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

I agree with Kalma. Why delete all the random fun big_smile

To be honest I the changes don't seem to affect the gameplay too much. Only way I could notice that jawnmode was used on FTK3 was the Jawnmode On text at countdown. I would still like to play with original setting in the future (that includes fallbunny on).

Offline

 

#25 30 Jun 2007 12:12:23

sassa
Administrator
From: Umeå, Sweden
Registered: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 2213
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

I want fairpacks!!!!

Offline

 

#26 02 Jul 2007 15:10:55

Tonik
Member
Registered: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 233

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

I'm a long-time proponent of "unfairpacks":  drop the current weapon if it was being fired at the time of death, otherwise drop nothing.

This is exactly what happens when shotgun scripts are used.

Offline

 

#27 02 Jul 2007 15:36:18

Willgurht
Admin
From: Stockholm
Registered: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 554

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

so if u have 0 rox and RL and want teammate to sg you for the pack?

wouldnt be possible with your method tonik.

However i think that would be the best solution. Or even better. Players can toggle drop-selected/drop-if-being-fired

Offline

 

#28 02 Jul 2007 16:20:07

sassa
Administrator
From: Umeå, Sweden
Registered: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 2213
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

I think he was talking about FFA mod willgurth and not 4on4

Offline

 

#29 02 Jul 2007 16:48:05

Tonik
Member
Registered: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 233

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Here's an idea, you could make it drop the current weapon in a teamkill

EDIT: oops, you can't select a weapon without ammo in QW

Sassa:  I'm looking for a solution for all game modes.  I find it annoying that people have to employ client-side scripts to be competitive.   I would be happy to see a ruleset where shotgun scripts would be redundant.

Easier configuration = easier to get into the game for a noob.

Last edited by Tonik (02 Jul 2007 16:52:44)

Offline

 

#30 02 Jul 2007 19:44:38

molgrum
Admin
Registered: 22 May 2006
Posts: 726

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Happy to see some ideas and comments here!

It's possible to make jawnmode act different in different game modes, this is kinda my plan. For example, visible packs could either be enabled for DMM3 and disabled for DMM1, or enabled for FFA, and disabled for all other types. Give some suggestions to what you think should be enabled/disabled when a certain variable/mode/gametype is set.
I agree fully with you Tonik that there should be a solution to weaponscripts, fairpacks was one candidate, you have another which I must say sounds better in tactical games (4on4). In FFA I could implement something that drops ALL weapons and one ammopack, what do you think?

BTW, the airstep code seems much nicer now so it will probably be inserted as enabled in jawnmode. Would be cool if vb could look here as well, the creator of jawnmode, but he's nowhere to be found.


---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.

Offline

 

#31 05 Jul 2007 21:59:59

Apollyon
Admin
From: Berlin
Registered: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 59

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Now after playing a few rounds with jawnmode i must day i don't like it. At least not in ffa. Yes, it is fun to zip up/down stairs at amazing speed but speed is not everything. I think mappers not only make stairs to provide access to other levels but also to slow down the map in certain places to promote more tactical play.
But what is really annoying with jawnmode is that the lower tier weapons got much better and the armors nerfed. This leads to gameplay that is terribly reminding me of the cess you see in Q3A. QW ffa is fast and hectic anyway but with jawnmode turned on you die much faster than usually and all the time you have the feeling that you just cannot do anything against it.

Offline

 

#32 05 Jul 2007 22:29:52

Up2nOgOoD[ROCK]
Administrator
From: California
Registered: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 439

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

I'd like some clarification:

"JawnMode is a few tweaks to QW to promote additional skills and remove randomness that negates existing skills."

Please tell me why the following has been changed:

NG: Nail speed increased from 1000 to 1800.
SNG: Nail speed increased from 1000 to 1800.
Lavaballs: Removed in JawnMode.
Dynamic lights: No pent glow on spawn in DMM4.

How does the above reduce randomness, and why change those things?

and the biggie:

GA: Protection now 50% (1:1), was 30%
RA: Protection now 75% (1:3), was 80%
YA: Protection now 67% (1:2), was 60%

why?

Offline

 

#33 05 Jul 2007 23:31:49

Aquashark
Member
From: across ARCADES this summer..
Registered: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 1039
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

guys, guys..
will you give my Crapfest Mod v0.0.6 a try?
i think it will make FFA more fun and skillful, rather than mindless spam all over the map and camping at RL smile

Last edited by Aquashark (05 Jul 2007 23:32:20)


god damn hippies >_<

Offline

 

#34 06 Jul 2007 00:05:16

molgrum
Admin
Registered: 22 May 2006
Posts: 726

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Apollyon:

I agree that speed is not everything, but it's a major part of what makes QW a great game which makes it very important smile
Airstep will cap your speed with 16% every time you hit a step, try it out on aerowalk for example where you'll have to walk up the big stairs unless you RJ. I think it worked out great on head-shot so until this time I can't say I don't like it.
The weapons that are better are NG/SNG (or just SNG since noone uses NG at all) that are almost double the velocity, and SSG that has 2 extra pellets (+8 dmg). But I think that the reason you die more is because RA is nerfed and SNG much faster. SSG is a bit better but I don't think it makes much difference? Might also be the non-randomness which makes aiming a 100% factor if you hit or not.
I've thought about the RA nerfing and it might be better to make ALL armors stronger than before (not just GA/YA)? What do you think, would sure put alot of weight on them as if there wasn't any already!

Up2:

In regular QW...
Lavaballs(tm) are totally random (except for the origin).
Dynamic lights in DMM4 are useless.
Nailgun speed is too slow.
GA is too weak to bother about most of the time.

Play a game in FTK before violating our fine electrical messaging board systems my good sir!

Last edited by molgrum (06 Jul 2007 00:06:01)


---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.

Offline

 

#35 06 Jul 2007 00:12:59

Up2nOgOoD[ROCK]
Administrator
From: California
Registered: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 439

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

seems to me all the decisions about the speed of nails and armor protection %'s have been made by one person for the whole community, my good sir.

My point was that this does not decrease randomness, so why change it.

Offline

 

#36 06 Jul 2007 00:22:17

Aquashark
Member
From: across ARCADES this summer..
Registered: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 1039
Website

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Up2nOgOoD[ROCK] wrote:

seems to me all the decisions about the speed of nails and armor protection %'s have been made by one person for the whole community, my good sir.

My point was that this does not decrease randomness, so why change it.

those weren't changed because of randomness.. they were changed because of uselessness

NG & SNG are practically useless, so is the GA.. vb wanted to make his mod fair smile


god damn hippies >_<

Offline

 

#37 06 Jul 2007 00:34:22

molgrum
Admin
Registered: 22 May 2006
Posts: 726

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Up2:

Why not change it?


---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.

Offline

 

#38 06 Jul 2007 07:01:00

Up2nOgOoD[ROCK]
Administrator
From: California
Registered: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 439

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

........?

Offline

 

#39 06 Jul 2007 12:22:40

molgrum
Admin
Registered: 22 May 2006
Posts: 726

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

Aquashark:

The problem is getting the crapfest mod into KTX, as I think qqshka will not be adding more modes after this one hmm


---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.

Offline

 

#40 06 Jul 2007 15:03:23

Willgurht
Admin
From: Stockholm
Registered: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 554

Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.

what about race mode?

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson