User panel stuff on forum
  9 posts on 1 page  1
Help
2008-10-03, 02:36
Member
111 posts

Registered:
Jul 2006
hi


is it possible to get 77 fps stable on this box?


p2 450 or 400 mhz
256 mb ram
nvidia riva 128 8mb
win xp

fuhquake / software / 320x240

average fps : 40 with r_max_size_1 1 etc ,no trails etc ...


is it even possible?

format/defrag ? any supertweaks?
2008-10-03, 04:10
Member
28 posts

Registered:
Feb 2008
The biggest weakness of that setup is your OS. You can't run XP with 256 mb ram and expect any type of performance. I used a P2 450 with Win ME, running mqwcl a long time ago and had no troubles getting stable 77fps. Might work with Win2000 as well but 98/ME is a better bet. Also, since fuhquake and other clients came later on it wasn't really critical with a fast engine since everybody had good enough machines.
I'd try mqwcl 320x200 with ME. Shouldn't be a problem to get smooth gameplay then.
http://www.myspace.com/cervello
2008-10-03, 06:10
Member
9 posts

Registered:
Jun 2007
The biggest weakness is your nick.

...and your in-game smileys. You will never get a stable 77 fps with them spamming all over the screen.
2008-10-03, 07:28
Member
347 posts

Registered:
Feb 2006
You might also want to consider Linux. I know I used to run moreQuakeworld in Linux on my old 400MHz K6-2 w/128MB RAM *just* to get better FPS compared to Windows. Don't know if that Quake LiveCD is still around, because if it is, give it a try.
2008-10-03, 08:41
Member
26 posts

Registered:
Jul 2007
I would also recommend turning into Linux. I had a P2 400 with 2mb Matrox graphics (G100 or G200 maybe) card and managed to run on solid 72fps (that's what we used back then...). Once I even ran a 4on4 server on the background without loss in FPS. The resolution was 320x200 and what was special on this computer was the bus speed of 100Mhz. Faster computers normally had a 66mhz bus back in those days, and I think this made a difference here.
2008-10-03, 11:07
Member
364 posts

Registered:
Oct 2006
software client's video subsystem works poorly in NT-based OSes (not the OS's fault, just bad old code no one can be bothered to fix). You should get reasonably stable 77fps in Win98, and maybe in Linux too.
2008-10-16, 16:50
Member
111 posts

Registered:
Jul 2006
i just wanted to say i almost solved my problem , have 77 fps almost everywhere but still need some tweaking...



anyway how i solved it was -nodirectdraw ... disable direct draw and use the DIB video modes


for example 320x200@75hz


btw only resolution i can select with 85 hz is 640x400 and up, anyway to run 77 hz or 85 hz in 320x200 ?

even if its DIB only modes?

powerstrip ?
2008-10-16, 18:46
Member
28 posts

Registered:
Feb 2008
Or you can try refreshtool, which is free: http://www.majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=1457
http://www.myspace.com/cervello
2008-10-17, 01:52
Member
111 posts

Registered:
Jul 2006
ty ljuglampa ill try it
  9 posts on 1 page  1