QuakeWorld.nu Forum
QuakeWorld.nu Forum
You are not logged in.
Announcement
#121 27 Sep 2007 20:11:37
- Tonik
- Member
- Registered: 18 Oct 2006
- Posts: 242
Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.
oh, I thought that was called sg scripts
Offline
#122 27 Sep 2007 22:19:55
- molgrum
- Admin
- Registered: 22 May 2006
- Posts: 726
Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.
There seems to be no real dictionary about this stuff 
---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.
Offline
#123 27 Sep 2007 23:01:41
- Tonik
- Member
- Registered: 18 Oct 2006
- Posts: 242
Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.
That can be helped
Offline
#124 27 Sep 2007 23:51:58
- dakoth
- Member
- Registered: 08 Feb 2006
- Posts: 151
Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.
molgrum wrote:
I really can't see how my method resembles a binary tree in any way?
I never said it did, I just pointed out what the term means I have no idea how the whole spawn thing works - just trying to help.
tonik wrote:
"weaponscript kiddies having an advantage"? What the fuck, have you been living under a rock or something? Haven't like 80% of the players had +rl bound to mouse1 for the past 8 years? (for all I know, I may be exaggerating -- or I may not)
Regardless, I think you're entitled to call people using extreme scripting just to simplify the game just that - I'm one of them, but only because I think I'd loose too much edge from dropping all my weaponscripts. According to a poll recently taken here on qw.nu, many are in the same situation (forced to use it, rather than doing it by choice).
Offline
#125 28 Sep 2007 07:22:22
- molgrum
- Admin
- Registered: 22 May 2006
- Posts: 726
Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.
dakoth wrote:
I never said it did, I just pointed out what the term means
Ok, thanks
dakoth wrote:
Regardless, I think you're entitled to call people using extreme scripting just to simplify the game just that - I'm one of them, but only because I think I'd loose too much edge from dropping all my weaponscripts. According to a poll recently taken here on qw.nu, many are in the same situation (forced to use it, rather than doing it by choice).
So it's still a problem that axe/sg scripts are used, yet fairpacks is a bad idea. Any other ideas? 
---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.
Offline
#126 28 Sep 2007 07:42:50
- molgrum
- Admin
- Registered: 22 May 2006
- Posts: 726
Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.
Back on track... Seems like model #2 is the more popular one?
http://www.quakeworld.nu/forum/viewtopi … 258#p29258
---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.
Offline
#127 28 Sep 2007 16:10:39
- dakoth
- Member
- Registered: 08 Feb 2006
- Posts: 151
Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.
The only solution I really have, and bear I'm mind I'm no coder, has the side-effect of seriously crippling quake's "scripting language" - the disabling of semicolons in any aliases/binds. That is to say, you would only be able to issue one command per button.
Offline
#128 28 Sep 2007 16:17:32
- Willgurht
- Admin
- From: Stockholm
- Registered: 09 Feb 2006
- Posts: 554
Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.
dakoth wrote:
The only solution I really have, and bear I'm mind I'm no coder, has the side-effect of seriously crippling quake's "scripting language" - the disabling of semicolons in any aliases/binds. That is to say, you would only be able to issue one command per button.
agreed. Remove semi colon!
Offline
#129 28 Sep 2007 16:44:04
- molgrum
- Admin
- Registered: 22 May 2006
- Posts: 726
Re: FTK: Suggestion about rule changes.
I don't think disabling semicolon will be very appreciated, at least not by me
Edit: Besides, I think a server-side solution would be the only acceptable one since you can always get around it if the restriction relies upon the client.
---
Where can you see lions? Only in kenya! Come to kenya we've got lions.
Offline